Thursday, October 6, 2016

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning

Don’t start rooting for any of the teenagers in the 2006 horror prequel “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning.” Normally horrific movie gives the origin story about Thomas Hewitt, better known as “Leatherface,” reprised by Andrew Bryniarski – you can guess that the teens are more than just victims for the Ed Gein-inspired murderer. Even though the “Star Wars” prequels told the certain parts where it showed how Anakin became Darth Vader, here it is implied that Hewitt was always a villain. Peter Debruge stated in his review, “In light of the 2003 Michael Bay-produced remake’s $80 million box office take, expect this entry from “Rings” helmer Jonathan Liebesman to scare up healthy numbers.”

From Jason Voorhees’ signature hockey mask to Mike Myers’ William Shatner mask, masks are essential in American horror movies, and the scariest is undeniably Leatherface’s, which he skinned from one of his victim’s face and sewed it together as a façade to how deformed he is. Despite that this prequel gives little psychological looks at Leatherface’s behavior, it does give horror fans a look at how the horrifying mask was made.

Debruge notes, “Hewitt’s sorry life dawns in a seedy slaughterhouse that, circa 1939, has seen none of the reform Upton Sinclair advocated in “The Jungle.”” Sitting on a fly-covered conveyor belt, a pregnant employee, played by Leslie Calkins, and gives birth to a malformed baby, unassisted. After this lady dies and the infant is stranded, he is rescued by Luda Mae Hewitt (Allison Marich) and is brought home to Charlie Hewitt Jr./Sheriff Hoyt (R. Lee Ermey).

Thirty years later, the same slaughterhouse fails a health inspection test, but Thomas Hewitt refuses to stop cutting meat. In response to the boss, played by Tim De Zarn, demanding him to leave, Thomas beats him over the head, and then sees if there is a better weapon. Soon, he finds the famous chainsaw that made him famous.

The sheriff, played by Lew Temple, finds Thomas, who still has the chainsaw. Because this is a stupid cop who leaves his shotgun in the car and Charlie in the passenger seat, the sheriff gets out of the car to interrogate Thomas. Looks like Charlie thirsts more for murder than Thomas does, and he shoots the sheriff from behind. Later, as they are eating the man’s boyd for dinner, he says, “We ain’t never gonna go hungry again.”

Debruge mentioned, “As scripted, these scenes might have played for camp or comic effect, but Liebesman hews close to the 2003 pic’s bile-tinged snuff-film aesthetic. His approach falls somewhere between the overwrought sadism of the “Saw” series and the giddy gore-for-gore’s-sake energy of “The Devil’s Rejects,” sharing those films’ twisted notion that today’s auds are willing to embrace such homicidal maniacs as heroes.”

To start his murdering job, what Leatherface really needs are victims, and this movie rightfully gives him a fresh group of teenagers (Jordana Brewster, Taylor Handley, Diora Baird and Matt Bomer) to meet his match – two brothers enlisted for Vietnam and their girlfriends tagging with them. Debruge noted, “Of the four, Jordana Brewster escapes much of the movie’s brutality, outliving her less fortunate co-stars long enough to find a “Wolf Creek”-worthy surprise waiting in the backseat of her getaway vehicle.”

Conservatives asking what happened at the family dinner scene (deleted from the 2003 remake) will be happy to find a more disturbing scene recreated here. Audiences should be noted not to try watching this movie while or after eating.

Debruge ended his review by saying, “Technical aspects mimic the 2003 pic, which traded original’s low-budget verite style for a more contemporary musicvideo look.”

In my opinion, I thought that this movie was actually better than the remake, if you can believe that. Maybe it was because this movie scared me while the 2003 remake didn’t really but had me questioning the kids’ motives. However, I do give this a recommendation, but if you don’t like, I can understand why. I think that this is probably second best in the franchise.

Well, tomorrow I will be looking at an interesting one in the final installment of my “Texas Chainsaw Massacre marathon.” What I mean is that they actually attempted another sequel taking place directly after the original movie. How is it? Does it turn out good or another bad installment? Find out tomorrow in the finale to my review on this franchise for “Halloween Month.”

No comments:

Post a Comment