Foundas went on to say, “In the press notes, one of
the exec producers cavalierly notes admits that the idea for the remake stemmed
from research showing that 90% of the film’s core, males-under-25 audience knew
the title of Hooper’s film, but had never seen it.” Few will figure out that
screenwriter Scott Kosar and Director Marcus Nispel begin this movie with a
shocking loyalty to the original. To start off, John Larroquette is now the
narrator to the person who read the credits from the 1974 film, telling the
viewers this movie is based on a true story. (This franchise is loosely based
on Ed Gein, which also was the inspiration for Robert Bloch to write “Psycho.”)
Next it cuts to the similar van which occupies the
five friends taking a road trip through the hot Texas, which Foundas noted, “Photographed
in extreme long shot and framed near the bottom of the screen in a precise
duplication of one of the original “Massacre’s” most memorably askew images.
(To accomplish the trick, Nispel employed cinematographer Daniel C. Pearl, who
was Hooper’s d.p. 29 years ago.)”
The teenagers in the van look a little more blended
and ready for anything scary than ever. First you got the drug-addict clown
Kemper (Eric Balfour), his tomboy girlfriend Erin (the hot Jessica Biel from “7th
Heaven”), narcissist Andy (Mike Vogel), the glasses wearing smarty Morgan
(Jonathan Tucker), and the hitchhiker Pepper (Erica Leerhsen), who was already
there when the film started.
The beginning of the
film is true to the non-complaints visuals of 1970s independent filmmaking, and
lacks the look of a postmodern hilarity that took away horror movies of their
main mission to scare.
Foundas mentioned that,
“A large part of what made the first “Massacre” so indelible was its stark,
evocative atmosphere — the slow encroachment of the chainsaw splatter on a
placid, Georgia O’Keefe landscape. And when it begins, Nispel’s “Massacre”
likewise suggests a picture-postcard pregnant with dread.”
All of that starts when
the friends pick up another hitchhiker – a severely beaten teenage girl, played
by Lauren German, walking on the road – when things start to go bad, both for
the characters and the movie. Rather than simply giving the main characters a
scare (the way the original 1974 movie did with the male hitchhiker), this hitchhiker
shoots herself in the head with a gun. This part is where Nispel’s camera zooms
into the gunshot in her head and out through the big one in the rear window of the
van.
When the notice this,
it causes these kids to get help at an innocuous farmhouse where they meet the
deadly Leatherface, played by Andrew Bryniarski. The suicide is also more obvious
than anything in the original, and turns Nispel’s film into the very
predictable and “know what’s going to happen” fact – a movie with more gore
than the original, but only a part of its filmmaking creativity.
Foundas admitted, “A
large part of what made the first “Massacre” so indelible was its stark,
evocative atmosphere — the slow encroachment of the chainsaw splatter on a
placid, Georgia O’Keefe landscape. And when it begins, Nispel’s “Massacre”
likewise suggests a picture-postcard pregnant with dread.”
In a superfluous part,
R. Lee Ermey (who you might remember from the classic “Full Metal Jacket”)
plays the local sheriff so much dramatic enjoyment that you must wonder why
Leatherface didn’t already lock him up in the freezer. Also, Leatherface’s
entire clan (David Dorfman, Lauren German, Terrence Evans, Marietta Marich and
Heather Kafka) – always the weakest part of the movie – is described by Foundas
as “fleshed-out, suggesting a citywide, pod-people-esque conspiracy.”
Foundas mentioned that,
“Pic then falls into a “Scream”-like self-referential abyss as Internet geek
Harry Knowles shows up as one of the decapitated heads decorating Leatherface’s
workspace. In the end, the cumulative effect is that everything that was
abstract and nightmarish in the original is crudely literalized here.”
In a small credit on a
role made by Marilyn Burns, Biel is hot and interesting, despite the filmmakers
attempt to make her a lot like one of the strong female characters in a horror
movie, straight to the fight with Leatherface that looks like it was there just
to promote feminist power.
My thoughts are that
this is better than the second and fourth installments, but it’s still a weak
remake. I just don’t see a point in making all of these installments this way
when there were plenty of opportunities and ideas open for anything. However,
the makers think that the film should just be rebooted each time, and I have
never heard of a horror film that got remade “this” many times. Just don’t see
it, in my opinion.
This film actually had a
prequel, which I thought was actually better. If you want to know why, you will
find out tomorrow in the next installment of “Halloween Month.”
No comments:
Post a Comment