Disney continues to
underwhelm with another botched remake of an animated classic, this time
remaking the favorite 1994 classic, “The Lion King” in a CG adaptation just
mainly focused on making life-like CGI animals that it forgets to do anything
else of value in the runtime.
The remake faithfully
retells the story of Simba, a young lion (JD McCrary) who is the son of Mufasa
(James Earl Jones), the King of the Pride Lands. On planning to steal the
authority, Simba’s uncle Scar, voiced by Chiwetel Ejiofor, kills Mufasa, and
makes the cub believe that his father’s death was his own fault. Simba runs
from Pride Rock, surviving an attack by Scar’s hyena minions (Florence Kasumba,
Keegan-Michael Key, Eric Andre and J. Lee) before passing out in the middle of
the desert. He is about to be eaten by vultures until he is rescued by meerkat
Timon (Billy Eichner) and warthog Pumbaa (Seth Rogen) who becomes his friends.
However, his past comes
back to him years later when he is a young adult, voiced by Donald Glover,
forcing him to remember who he really is and take back his position as the
rightful king of Pride Rock.
The story is still the same,
as does many of the familiar scenes and the songs (however some of the
memorable moments are furiously missing), but the remake fails to recapture the
original’s timeless likeability.
Sameen Amer is right
when she said in her review, “The animals, though incredibly realistic, lack
the expressiveness and emotiveness of their traditionally animated
counterparts. The storytelling no longer holds the same impact it did the first
time around. The vibrancy and liveliness is gone, replaced by hollow retreading
that leaves you yearning for original content instead of this endless string of
remakes.”
Undeniably, the remake
of “The Lion King” is going to make you want to watch the original over this
mess. Amer ended her review by saying, rightfully so, “The film just feels like
a soulless rehash of its predecessor and proves that no amount of technical
wizardry can trump solid, affecting storytelling.”
I’m sorry, but nothing
in this movie is going to make me like it. What was the purpose of remaking “The
Lion King,” an already perfect movie? The voice cast didn’t act out the
characters right, lines and scenes that were trimmed felt missed, scenes that
were extended were superfluous, every animal had a blank, expressionless face throughout that you didn't feel any emotion from them, even when the lines were said, the songs didn’t have that same feel like the
original and they stole the first line of Be Our Guest from “Beauty and the
Beast!!!” Why!?!?!? What were you thinking!?!?!? Also, what's the reason for making this nearly two hours long when the original was only around the 90 minute mark and told the story much nicer than this one did!?!?!? If you love the original, like
I do, seeing how it might be my most watched Disney movie growing up, avoid
this remake at all cost. Seriously Disney, you need to stop with these awful
remakes! What’s next? Live-action remakes of the direct-to-video sequels!? Come
out with original ideas again!!!
Now I’m going to cool
off so stay tuned for the next installment of “Halloween Month” on Monday.
No comments:
Post a Comment