Dana Stevens stated in
her review, “Moments before the screening of Toy Story 3 (Disney/Pixar) began,
my viewing companion and I were remembering the waterworks that inevitably
accompany that montage. (I just watched it online before embedding the link
above and, yep, cried again.) Stories about the waning of childhood fantasy,
the process by which our earliest playthings are divested of their once-magical
aura, touch on an experience of loss that's familiar to everyone but that's
seldom depicted in art. "That kind of story gets to me more than any
other," confessed my friend as the lights went down and we donned our 3-D
glasses.”
Stevens
went on to say, “He had no idea what he was in for or how grateful we would
both be for the glasses to hide behind. Like the marriage montage near the beginning of Up,
the last 10 minutes of Toy Story 3 seem to have been developed in
collaboration with an ophthalmologist specializing in the production of tears.”
Maybe Pixar has one on their crew? The sad message of Jessie’s song, which
takes up only a few minutes of screen time in the then animated adventure of “Toy
Story 2,” is what takes up the entirety of “Toy Story 3,” released in 2010.
This had to have been the most emotionally difficult film targeted towards
children. (However, if you look at it, the original children audience of “Toy
Story” are now adults, the film has been made for adults as well.)
In “Toy Story 3,” our favorite group of
toys are now facing the inevitable part of life, the fear of abandonment, the loss
of love. Stevens stated, “These are
some existentially engaged friggin' toys. And yet the overwhelming mood of the
movie is one of ebullience, generosity, and joy. That weepy ending, combined
with the laugh-per-second energy of the hour and a half that preceded it, sends
the viewer out of the movie in a state of cathartic uplift, as if she'd been
Rolfed. (But don't float out before the final credits—they're packed with
high-quality Pixar Easter eggs.)”
For those who haven’t seen, or don’t
remember, the first two films (the third was released, surprisingly, 15 years
after the first one was), the toys that have been owned by Andy, the child who
must have been somewhere in the middle of his Elementary School years when the franchise
started. He’s now 17, voiced by John Morris, and packing his bags to leave for
college. (The director, Lee Unkrich, gets the audience caught up with what
happened with Andy in a nicely done home-video montage). After some thought on
whether he’ll donate his toys or keep them in the attic, Andy sentimentally
chooses the later – but his mother, thinking the unmarked bag of toys is
garbage, takes it out to the trash can. Now, Woody, the one toy Andy put aside
to take to college, goes outside to save his friends.
The events that unfold afterwards
are a complicatedly planned chase that eventually ends up at a day care center
called Sunnyside – a place that’s not what it looks like on the façade. Woody,
Jessie, Buzz and the rest are welcomed by the superficially gentle Lots-o’-Huggin
Bear, voiced by Ned Beatty, which is another character that will refer to in a
scary whisper as “that evil bear who smells like strawberries.” Lotso lets the toys
know that at Sunnyside, they’ll once again find children to play with them.
Instead, Andy’s former toys are thrown around like rag dolls by a roomful of toddlers
that must be on a sugar high and, when they try to escape, are held prisoner by
Lotso, his silently terrifying sidekick Big Baby, and a clothes-obsessed Ken
doll, voiced by Michael Keaton, whose ethics aren’t the only uncertain thing
about him.
The people at Pixar who created this
must be a very active and rough, because if there’s a toy-related gag made up by
the human mind, it’s somewhere in the movie. Every single screen time is filled
with unusual toys appearing out of boxes and dashing around shelves: There’s a
Fisher Price telephone on wheels talking to others by ringing his speaker,
voiced by Teddy Newton. A robot toy who bounces between two expressions – happy
and mad – by banging his own head, voiced by Jan Rabson. A lederhosen-wearing
hedgehog, voiced by Timothy Dalton, who likes to think of himself as a gifted actor.
Stevens added, “And a brilliant long-form gag that raises the ontological
question: In what feature of a Mr. Potato Head does the spud's spiritual
essence reside?” Somehow, the plethora of characters, jokes and action scenes
never feels disjointing or too much. Through everything, the toys’ plan is
straightforward and clear: They must get back home to Andy who, even though he’s
an adult, still loves them. Stevens went on to say, “As for that last sequence
after they do—hold up. I need a moment.”
Go ahead and ask: Is there anything
wrong with “Toy Story 3?” Stevens said, “Well, the addition of 3-D to the
franchise's universe does seem like a move motivated more by marketing than
artistic necessity (which was also the case, I thought, with Up). The
depth effect looks crisp enough, but with a couple of somewhat gimmicky exceptions,
it rarely gets used. (That weakness is more than overcome in Day & Night,
a wordless short that precedes the movie and is the most inventive use of
animated 3-D I've ever seen.) And I guess—racking my brains here—that a few of
the newly introduced characters are a little underwritten. (Though Ken is a
marvel—one of the most complex characters, animated or otherwise, to appear on
screens this year.)”
In the end, nitpicking a movie this richly
filled with amazements feels like a move of thanklessness. “Toy Story 3” is an
almost perfect film in Pixar’s company, a children’s franchise that will be
watched and liked when I have children when they have toys that are boxed away
in our basement.
This is another one of my favorites
in the Pixar series. If you loved the first two a lot, go ahead and see this
one, this is the best amongst the entire trilogy. Each film got better and
better, and this one is no exception. See it if you haven’t because I cannot do
the film justice with this review. My siblings saw this in the theaters without me so I had to wait until I got this from the library.
Surprisingly, they are actually planning on releasing a "Toy Story 4" in about 2-3 years. I don't understand why they are planning that when it seems like a huge cash grab, but if it shocks us again like this one did, then let's just wait and find out.
Surprisingly, they are actually planning on releasing a "Toy Story 4" in about 2-3 years. I don't understand why they are planning that when it seems like a huge cash grab, but if it shocks us again like this one did, then let's just wait and find out.
Look out tomorrow when I look at
another sequel in “Disney’s Pixar Month.”
No comments:
Post a Comment