Roger Ebert described in his review, “The millionaire
is a predator, a corporate raider, a Wall Street shark.” His name is Gordon
Gekko, the name is inspired by the lizard that eats insects and sheds its tail
when trapped. Played by Michael Douglas in Oliver Stone’s “Wall Street,” released
in 1987, he paces harshly behind the desk in his skyscraper office, lighting
cigarettes, stabbing them out, checking stock prices on a bank of computers,
shouting buy and sell orders into a speaker phone. In his personal life he has
everything he could possibly want – wife, family, estate, pool, limousine,
priceless art objects – and they are all just additional stuff to have. He likes
to win.
Ebert mentions, “The kid is a broker for a second-tier
Wall Street firm. He works the phones, soliciting new clients, offering
second-hand advice, buying and selling and dreaming.” “Just once I’d like to be
on that side,” he says, eagerly looking at the telephone a client has just used
to give him a $7,000 loss. Gekko is his hero. He wants to sell him stock, get
into his clique, be like he is. Every day for 39 days, he calls Gekko’s office
for an appointment. Ebert said, “On the 40th day, Gekko’s birthday, he appears
with a box of Havana cigars from Davidoff’s in London, and Gekko grants him an
audience.”
Maybe Gekko sees something he recognizes. The kid,
named Bud Fox, played by Charlie Sheen, comes from a working-class family. His father,
played by Martin Sheen, is an aircraft mechanic and union leader. Gekko went to
a cheap university himself. Desperate to impress Gekko, Fox gives some inside
information he got from his father. Gekko makes some money on the deal and
opens an account with Fox. He also asks him to obtain more insider information,
and to spy on a competitor. Fox protests that he is being asked to do something
illegal. Perhaps “protests” is too strong a word. He “observes.”
Gekko knows his man. Ebert said, “Fox is so hungry to
make a killing, he will do anything.” Gekko promises him perks – big perks –
and they arrive on schedule. One of them is a tall, blond interior designer, played
by Daryl Hannah, who decorates Fox’s expensive new high-rise apartment. Ebert
described, “The movie’s stylistic approach is rigorous: We are never allowed to
luxuriate in the splendor of these new surroundings.” The apartment is never really
seen, never relaxed in. when the girl comes to share Fox’s bed, they are seen
momentarily, in silhouette. Intercourse and possessions are secondary to
trading to the action. Ask any gambler.
Ebert described, “Stone’s “Wall Street” is a radical
critique of the capitalist trading mentality, and it obviously comes at a time
when the financial community is especially vulnerable. The movie argues that
most small investors are dupes, and that the big market killings are made by
men such as Gekko, who swoop in and snap whole companies out from under the
noses of their stockholders. What the Gekkos do is immoral and illegal, but
they use a little litany to excuse themselves:” “Nobody gets hurt.” “Everybody’s
doing it.” “There’s something in this deal for everybody.” “Who knows except
us?”
The movie has a traditional plot structure: The desperate
young man is impressed by the successful old man, seduced by him, betrayed by
him, and then tries to turn the tables. The actual details of the plot are not
so important as the changes we see in the characters. Few men in previous
movies have been colder and more ruthless than Gekko, or more convincing. Ebert
said, “Fox is, by comparison, a babe in the woods. I would have preferred a
young actor who seemed more rapacious, such as James Spader, who has a
supporting role in the movie.” If the film has a flow, it is that Sheen never
looks quite relentless enough to move in Gekko’s circle.
Stone’s most impressive achievement in this film is to
allow all the financial wheeling and dealing to look complicated and
convincing, and yet always have it make sense. Ebert said, “The movie can be
followed by anybody, because the details of stock manipulation are all filtered
through transparent layers of greed.” Most of the time we know what’s going on.
All of the time, we know why.
Although Gekko’s law-breaking would obviously be against
by most people on Wall Street, his larger value system would be applauded. The trick
is to make his kind of money without breaking the law. Ebert described, “Financiers
who can do that, such as Donald Trump, are mentioned as possible presidential
candidates, and in his autobiography Trump states, quite simply, that money no
longer interests him very much.” He is more motivated by the challenge of a
deal and by the desire to win. His honesty is refreshing, but the key to
reading that statement is to see that it considers only money, on the one hand,
and winning, on the other. Ebert said, “No mention is made about creating goods
and services, to manufacturing things, to investing in a physical plant, to
contributing to the infrastructure.”
What’s investing about “Wall Street” – what may have been
the most discussed about the film – is that its real subject isn’t Wall Street
criminals who break the law. Stone’s subject is the value system that places
profits and wealth and the Deal above any other consideration. Ebert ended his
review by describing, “His film is an attack on an atmosphere of financial
competitiveness so ferocious that ethics are simply irrelevant, and the laws
are sort of like the referee in pro wrestling – part of the show.”
This is probably another one of my favorite movies. This
really describes what Wall Street is like and why you should never invest in
stocks when you get older. Of course, people who see this probably knows about
that but it’s worth seeing nonetheless, especially how great the three lead
actors play their roles. If you love these three actors, you should see this
movie, I give it a high recommendation. Like I already stated, don’t play the stock
market, get a fiduciary. According to Charlie Sheen, it was Oliver Stone’s idea for Martin Sheen to play the father in this film, which you couldn
This movie, which may come as a surprise, had a
sequel, but I’m not looking at that next week. Instead, I will be looking at
another classic movie in “Michael Douglas Month.”
No comments:
Post a Comment