Monday, July 24, 2023

Avatar: The Way of Water

Yesterday, I finished watching “Avatar: The Way of Water” while exercising, on Disney+. Seeing how this film came out last December and I’m seeing this now, I will let everyone know what I thought about this much planned sequel.

It has been thirteen years since we were first introduced to the world of Pandora in James Cameron’s “Avatar.” Despite that, adjusted for inflation, “Avatar” is the highest-grossing film of all time, it has had a huge impact on pop culture. Tina Kakadelis said in her review, “Save for the immersive land in Disney’s Animal Kingdom in Florida, Ryan Gosling’s perfect Saturday Night Live sketch about the film’s font, and the looming threat of four sequels, Avatar disappeared from public view.” All of that changed when “Avatar: The Way of Water” came out.

Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), the human hero who permanently became a Na’vi at the end of the first film, has started a family with Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña). They have four children (Jamie Flatters, Britain Dalton, Sigourney Weaver, and Trinity Jo-Li Bliss) and live peacefully in the forests of Pandora. The violent Sky People (humans) from the first film have left, and there has been peace among the Na’vi. Now, a new group of Sky People arrive at Pandora and bring a new threat for the Na’vi. Not only are the Sky People looking to take over Pandora as a back-up plan for when Earth becomes unlivable, they’re looking to deal with Jake Sully.

Like the first film, “Avatar: The Way of Water” is a visual masterpiece. Kakadelis credited, “The creation of such a lush, expansive underwater world is a mystical feat of filmmaking. Cameron’s insistence on using the latest technology pays off in spades. The new underwater creatures are primordially futuristic, sharing the same bioluminescence as the forest creatures from the first film. Unfortunately, this awe-inspiring sheen wears thin fairly quickly as Avatar: The Way of Water forgoes plot development in favor of essentially turning into an episode of Planet Earth Pandora.”

The first film was about the Sky People’s obsession with digging for the rare unobtanium. You would think a main plot point to play just about the same role in the second movie, but that’s not true. The mineral is briefly mentioned in the sequel, and the want for the Sky People have to take over Pandora is far vaguer the second time around. At one point, they are there to make Pandora livable for humans when Earth goes extinct. Kakadelis noted, “That thread is quickly dropped in favor of mining a whale blubber that stops human aging and sells for $80 million for a small vial. Even that development is forgotten in favor of a multi-billion dollar personal vendetta against Jake Sully.”

Despite how visually different “Avatar: The Way of Water” is, Cameron is borrowing from his own work. Both Avatar movies end the exact same way and have countless scenes that are exactly identical. They just switch the forest for the ocean. The film ends in a scene taken straight from “Titanic,” and fight scenes would be ones you would see in “Terminator.” Kakadelis said, “This film is a pastiche of movies that already exist, dressed up in fancy technology.”

Kakadelis continued, “Avatar: The Way of Water is not the only culprit stretching its runtime to obscene lengths. It’s almost as though writers and directors view length as synonymous with quality.” Only a 3-hour film can be considered cinematically important. You would think that these extensive new runtimes would bring exciting, rich character development, but that has not been the case. None of the characters in this sequel act in a way that’s solid with what little the audience knows about their personalities. Instead, they are simply pawns that allow the writers to force events to happen, no matter how out of character they are.

Kakadelis said, “It’s hard to write off Avatar as a passing trend. There must be something that made the original into the huge box office phenomenon that it is. Perhaps it’s because of the uncanny valley aspect of the Na’vi people, but it remains difficult to connect emotionally with the performance-capture characters.” It’s more noticeable in the sequel because of the large number of Avatars.

Kakadelis ended her review by saying, “As with the first film, there will likely be droves of people who will keep showing up to screenings of Avatar: The Way of Water. It’s impossible to deny that they will be treated to a visual feast, but those looking for a more character-driven movie will be left adrift in the open water.”

At first, I thought I was going to like the sequel. It started off really nice and felt like it was going to be different and focus on the Na’vi, but immediately they did the exact same story as the first. Which is shocking since this is currently the third highest-grossing film. Just to think that more sequels will be coming out and they will predictably do the exact same story over again. If you liked the first one, you will probably get into this one just fine. However, for people like me, I loved the visuals in this film, but the story is what got to me. I have seen this story so many times as a kid, so I don’t need to see this again. Unfortunately, the people who made this film will not learn.

Thank you for joining in on this review today. Look out this Friday for the conclusion of “Macaulay Culkin Month.”

No comments:

Post a Comment