A title shares that it’s two years before the U.S.
Civil War. A line of chained black men are being forced along by two white slave
traders. A white German man, played by Christoph Waltz, driving a dentist’s
wagon crosses their path, introducing himself as King Schultz and wanting to
know if any of the slaves worked on a plantation where the Brittle brothers
were managers. One of the slaves, Django, played by Jamie Foxx, steps forward.
Shortly afterwards, the slave traders are killed, their prisoners are unchained
and Django and King have agreed on a deal.
He finds out that King is a very sharp bounty hunter,
who is desperate to identify his next mine (that is the Brittle brothers) and
in the long run, also open to having a right-hand man. Django, now being free,
wants to find his wife Broomhilda, played by Kerry Washington, who was taken
form him and sold to another plantation after they tried to escape together.
King believes Django’s story, comparing it to the Siegfried and Brunhilde Germanic
legend, and promises to help. The journey takes the men to Candyland, the
plantation owned by the especially evil slave owner Calvin Candie, played by
Leonardo DiCaprio.
Bernstein noted, “In broad strokes, things work out
about the way we’d expect, with righteous rage, blood fountaining up into the
air at regular intervals and tons of terrific signature Tarantino dialogue.
(Trust him to come up with a whole riff on a drawback to being a Klansman that
nobody has mentioned before.)”
The filmmaker also brings in a lot of historically
accurate shocks of slavery – there’s no “Gone with the Wind” reference here. These
scenes are meant to be uncomfortable to watch, so much so that the
psychological hurt of witnessing the evil motivates a main action in the latter
half of the movie. They are very powerful. How well one credits “Django
Unchained” largely depends on how well a person can take in the fast changes in
tone, from smart talk to energetic action to serious violence and back, countless
times. There are also a lot of racial slurs, one mainly, in the dialogue. Bernstein
said, “Granted, a lot of the characters are overseers, but some of it registers
as overkill.”
The actors, including Don Johnson, Walton Goggins, Ato
Essendoh, James Remar, Dennis Christopher, Michael Parks, and so many other
famous actors, all appear to be enjoying themselves, with the exception of
Foxx. Bernstein noted, “Granted, Django has plenty of reason to be intent and
unhappy, but while he’s impressive and in fact acts like a ‘70s indie Western
hero, he doesn’t seem as fully connected with his costars as he could be –
excepting leading lady Washington, with whom convincing sparks are struck.”
Tarantino clearly sees what he had in Waltz back in “Inglorious
Scoundrels” (I’m not saying the other word, this blog is swear free) (we all
saw why, including the Academy) and has here written him in another role that
displays his talents. Bernstein said, “This time, Waltz gets to use all that
urbane charm, shrewd observation and modest manner concealing lethal skills in
the service of a good-guy character, to such an extent that the movie deflates
a little when he’s absent.”
DiCaprio is crafty, polite, self-assured and every
piece the villain that a story of this kind asks for. DiCaprio plays Candie
with the calm confidence of a man who is sure he’s got everything right. Samuel
L. Jackson, almost unrecognizable with white hair and bushy eyebrows, is really
good, disappearing into the character of Candie’s very loyal valet.
The musical score is eclectic, which makes sense that
there are choices from Foxx and famous Western composer Ennio Morricone. Bernstein
noted that “when the Jim Croce folk/pop ballad “I Got a Name” accompanies a
traveling montage, it’s clear that not only is Tarantino referencing the ‘70s
(the style of the film and the titles emphasize this), but he’s reveling in
everything about the era, including its filmic anachronisms.”
“Django Unchained” goes off on so many tangents. A lot
of them are entertaining, but a few are just strange (some of them is a
sequence with Tarantino as an Australian). Unlike his other films, like “Pulp
Fiction” or even “Inglorious Scoundrels,” “Django Unchained” doesn’t have a
string of connected plot threads – by the end, there’s a feel that the movie
could have been fixed a little and not lost any of the elements that make it
work.
Bernstein ended her review by saying, “Still, if you
are a Tarantino fan, a ‘70s Western fan, a fan of any or all of the actors
involved or even just want a bloody, rousing, disturbing, crazy time at the
movies, DJANGO UNCHAINED is here to provide it all.”
This is a highly engaging Tarantino Western. I
recently saw this a few months back and I really enjoyed it. If you love Tarantino,
then this is one that shouldn’t be overlooked. I would have reviewed this back
when I did “Tarantino Month,” but I saved it for now, and hopefully people are
happy now. I really enjoyed this and thought it was great, so check it out.
Look out next week to see the other Tarantino Western
that I will review in the finale of “Western Month.”
No comments:
Post a Comment