Hanke continued, “As I
walked into the screening, I was asked if I was looking forward to the film.
Unfortunately, the dictates of good taste prevent me from repeating my answer
here, though I can say it involved a suggestion that the film would almost
certainly engage in a highly personal activity with a certain barnyard animal.
After all, I’d seen the trailer, which suggested yet another mindless
CGI-created action-athon with occasional time-out for snappy one-liners from
its star. It looked for all the world like a rehash of the cosmically godawful
Men in Black II. That is, without Tommy Lee Jones — thus leaving us only with
Will Smith, who hasn’t impressed me since Six Degrees of Separation.”
There was a statement
that just gave people the author who the makers of “I, Robot,” released in 2004,
said they based it off of: “suggested by the book by Isaac Asimov.” For those
that have seen the 1934 “The Black Cat” will know that Universal said that
exact sentence by stating “suggested by Edgar Allen Poe’s immortal classic.”
Hanke noted, “While I freely admit that the 1934 Black Cat is in my personal
pantheon of top-10 movies ever made, it has absolutely nothing to do with Mr.
Poe’s “immortal classic.””
Hanke continued, “So
with this to work from, the atmosphere of the screening was definitely one that
mixed grave misgivings with gloomy foreboding (and I’m again being polite).
Well, I was wrong — very wrong!” No, “I, Robot” is not Asimov’s story (or
stories), but it is inspired from the
great works of sci-fi. The three laws of robotics, which state that a robot
cannot hurt a human, are true to Asimov. Along with that, the film’s basic
story is rooted in his writing too. Of course, that is a small fact, hurting
only huge sci-fi fans, since the movie’s quality relies very little on this
main inspiration to its sources.
The real surprise is
that “I, Robot” is a rare release with summer blockbusters, a film with
something it’s thinking of. This doesn’t mean that it doesn’t have the
necessary requirements of a summer movie: It’s loud, it’s very funny, it’s
filled with perfectly enjoyable action scenes. However, there’s more to it than
that, some of which is really surprising. Hanke noted, “I, Robot may just be
the most subversive $100-million-plus movie ever made, with the kind of
sinister attitude usually associated with exploitation or art-house fare.”
Particularly, the film
has interested parallels between robots and racism, which is given a scheming twist
by having the prejudices against the robot population mainly from Will Smith’s
Del Spooner. “I saw a robot running with a woman’s purse. What was I supposed to think?” he asks his
supervisor, Lt. Bergin, played by the great Chi McBride, after Spooner wrongly
arrests a robot for “stealing” a purse. Later, robot magnate Lawrence Robinson,
played by Bruce Greenwood, cautiously blames Spooner of bigotry, thinking that
the policeman wants to believe a robot is guilty of murder just because Spooner
doesn’t “care for their kind.” (Hanke said, “All of this would play better if
the film — which otherwise oddly provides more Smith beefcake than Bridget
Moynahan cheesecake — didn’t insist on injecting a wholly arbitrary, homophobic
gag between Spooner and Robinson.”)
By the time “I, Robot”
explains what’s the problem with the strange events happening, it’s hard to
miss the (definitely intentional) parallels between the reasoning of the
villain and the language of the Patriot Act. Like with “X2,” which tells a
similar, but more specific, subtext, this works because it’s a logical result
of the story.
For a large summer
movie, “I, Robot” has a nicely solid story line, with Spooner’s racism against
robots the main factor of the film’s mystery. Also, the inventor of the robots,
Dr. Alfred Lanning, played by James Cromwell, has expected Spooner’s bigotry.
What really causes the action here is the robots’ growth to the point where
they can understand the three laws of robotics in a way that completely challenges
those laws (and here again, there’s a lot of subtext to see here).
Hanke noted, “At the
same time, it’s impossible to overlook the fact that I, Robot, for all its
merits, borrows shamelessly from a variety of sources — especially Blade Runner
and The Matrix series. The former is hardly surprising, since director Alex
Proyas has evoked that cult favorite at least twice already (The Crow and Dark City).”
When looking at the latter, it’s not much of a surprise to go from Spooner’s
apparently intelligent, pie-baking grandmother, played by Adrian Ricard, to the
Oracle of “The Matrix.” Still, there’s not really a feel of a rip-off than a
tribute and influence, and that popular culture is simply being interrupted
into the happenings.
Hanke mentioned, “The
biggest surprise is that it all works — or so nearly does that it seems
nit-picky to complain. Smith is impossibly good in the lead, and the obligatory
one-liners that seemed so arbitrary in the film’s trailer are actually held in
check and nicely integrated into the script. Plus, the Hollywood Screenwriting
101 antagonistic quasi-romantic relationship between Spooner and no-nonsense
scientist Susan Calvin (Moynahan) is handled with enough assurance to overcome
its cliched underpinnings.”
However the most successful
part of “I, Robot” is the creation of the film’s “renegade” robot, Sonny,
played by Alan Tudyk. Hanke mentioned, “Sounding somewhat creepily like Hal in
Kubrick’s 2001, Sonny is a CGI creation that has the kind of believable reality
we find in The Lord of the Rings‘ Gollum and with the mechanical tentacles of
“Doc Ock” in Spider-Man 2.”
Hanke continued, “In
other words, though I, Robot occasionally succumbs to a bit of Hollywoodized
cuteness, it also manages to turn an effect into a real character.” That in itself
makes this film worth watching.
I really liked and
enjoyed this movie when I saw it in theaters. It was definitely one of the most
enjoyable summer movies that I had saw that year. If you haven’t seen this
movie and you’re a Will Smith and/or robot movie fan, then you should
definitely check this one out. You will love it.
Look out next week for
the finale of “Robots Month.”
No comments:
Post a Comment