Friday, May 24, 2019

Waterworld

The thought of “Waterworld,” released in 1995, being “Mad Max” in the water is a right one, as both films are set in a post-apocalyptic world with anarchy, strange villains, and machinery chaos. The film would become well-known for being really over budget (becoming the most expensive film at the time), and when everyone heard about the production problems, it became a dud for many critics, while American audiences stayed away, believing its place as one of the biggest box office bombs of all time, despite it would get back its money in foreign releases.

For everything that made it bad, it’s actually not all that bad, and it does have some enjoyment as a simple action movie. Unfortunately, it isn’t really targeting action fans, as it has more in science fiction, adventure, drama and even a little comedy, and with these genres, the entertainment value is just at best, or at worst, almost missing.

The setting of “Waterworld” is a few hundred years from the present (maybe longer), when a time when the Earth is completely covered by water after the polar ice caps have melted away. The idea of dry land is only a myth, and the cost of currency on the trading market is dirt, which is the latest finding that the dusky mariner with no name, played by Kevin Costner, has a weak form of communication. When it’s found out that he has gills and webbed feet, he is called a mutant and is sentenced to die. However, an iron-fisted investor named Deacon (the late Dennis Hopper) attacks the sea village (the Atoll) close to his inevitable death, and in exchange for their safe passage, the mariner brings in two new passengers on his ship – a woman named Helen (Jeanne Tripplehorn) and a young girl named Enola (Tina Majorino). He hears that Enola has a tattoo on her back that is said to be a map to find dry land, and Deacon really wants to get her, stopping at nothing, including killing so many innocents to get that map to dry land.

Vince Leo said in his review, “Shaky science notwithstanding (many have claimed it an impossibility for the entire Earth to be covered in water even if the entirety of the polar caps melt), Waterworld seems the equivalent of a Roger Corman film if he had almost $200 million at his disposal to make one of his pet projects come to life.   Perhaps as a low-budget film, this sort of idea would have been enough to be passable as cult science fiction fare, but as a major studio attempt at a summer blockbuster, it's woefully inadequate.  The acting, especially by Hopper, is way over the top, with silly shenanigans and half-baked scientific explanations that make it unsuitable as a film to be taken seriously.” A man that is a mutant with gills, who even knows if that will take millions of years to happen, isn’t even worth the dramatic tension to pamper, especially since it doesn’t even fall under being really important to the overall story.

Leo said, “Yes, this was a far-fetched crock just from the first idea, and one can only speculate as to why such a lavish production couldn't have started with securing the rights to a more fully developed screenplay before they even started to engage in their free-spending production.” The only things of the film that work to its credit are the stunts and sword-fighting action scenes. Sadly, those aren’t really enough to hold our attention in a two hour and fifteen minute movie.

“Waterworld” isn’t as bad as the following you have heard about, but it’s also not nearly good enough to be called anything more than a wasteful mindless popcorn movie. Leo suggested, “If you're in the mood for escapist adventure and explosive vehicular carnage, this may suit your needs.  Even so, The Road Warrior did the same but much better at less that 3% of the budget of this overblown, underdeveloped misfire.”

Jack Black is also in this movie, but he doesn’t really leave a big impact. There’s so many plot holes that start to add up and for “the expensive movie at the time,” I would want more out of this as well. However, as a simple action movie, it’s not that bad. The sets are a lot of fun, you really get an atmosphere for this world, Dennis Hopper is enjoyably over the top, and watching the technical of this world is really enjoyable. I liked seeing how everything works and functions as it makes the world feel look a lot more practical and real. As a movie, this just falls right in the middle as an ok, average flick. Check it out if you’d like, but I don’t think this is for everyone. Also, Costner’s acting is not boring in this movie.

Alright everyone, stay tuned next week when I finish off “Kevin Costner Month.”

No comments:

Post a Comment