The first “Matrix” movie
may have been clichéd, but it took old elements and redid them in a great flick
focused by an essentially interesting concept and good story subtleties. “The
Matrix Reloaded” had its moments of excellence, but to get to them you had to
go through many boring fights and endless monologues about choosing from choice
and fate. It was a very different film and an overall disappointment. Those who
hoped for answers in “The Matrix Revolutions,” also released in 2003, or at
least a worthy sequel to the original film, are going to sadly be left with
about nothing again.
If this movie came out
sooner that year, maybe in July, it could have been in better hands because
what you see here is a summer blockbuster – and a very average one to say.
Garth Franklin mentioned in his review, “The money is all onscreen, the FX from
a technical point of view are utterly tremendous and visually it can't be
faulted.” However, the script & dialogues are terrible, the action scenes
go on way past the point of dull and the principal flow of the whole movie is
that by the end, the audience is left feeling very ripped off. Franklin
mentioned that, “Take away the pretty pictures and you have a film as equally
problematic as other bad sequels this year ala "Bad Boys" and
"Charlie's Angels" but without the playful sense of fun.”
Franklin goes on to say, “For
all the complaints about 'Reloaded' being too high brow, the opposite is true
with 'Revolutions' - there's almost no depth here.” The first half hour is also
the worst. If you haven’t seen the first two films, then don’t even try to
understand. If you haven’t seen “The Matrix Reloaded” before this, it’s still
going to be tough to sit through the beginning. Franklin mentions, “From a
family of programs in a train station limbo, to a new Oracle (Mary Alice) who
gives her role dignity but lacks the quirky sense of humour so signature of her
predecessor - its a class in exposition 101 with endless talking albeit very
little said.”
When the movie gets to
Mega City’s Club Hel (an interesting, but desperately theatrical club), we once
again meet the Merovingian (Lambert Wilson). Franklin brings up that, “Gone is
the dangerous man with a taste of eccentricity, replaced by a Bond-esque
olive-sucking baddie complete with trophy wife with just one line” (however,
the hot Italian actress and fashion model, Monica Bellucci’s shot of her chest
in here is the most impressive FX shot of the whole movie). After that point,
the film starts to deteriorate. The one that is the most notable is the main
actors of the movie are missing.
Franklin speculates, “Maybe
we've been spoiled by TV or films like "Return of the Jedi" or
"LOTR: The Two Towers" where there's constant cutting between 2-3 separate
subplots but its an effective storytelling method which helps keep the pace
moving and add tension.” For an hour or so in the middle of the movie, we see
the defense of Zion and that’s it. Franklin says, “Sure Morpheus' head appears
at times and Jada Pinkett Smith puts in a far better turn this time out, but
they're the B-story to what is one of the longest non-stop action sequences on
film.”
Franklin goes on to say, “Yes
its random faces (such as the overly eager kid (Clayton Watson) and the old
warhorse general (Nathaniel Lees)) in CG tonka toy gun suits shooting non-stop
at squids.” It’s fierce and furious to be sure, and impressive but also tiring
and insistent to the point it becomes tiresome. Zee (Nona Gaye) and her masculine
army friend (Laurence Fishburne’s wife, Gina Torres) (Franklin calls her “a
Vasquez wannabe”) fire rockets and more rockets, the council contemplates, the
shooting continues, some gets killed by Sentinels, something random crashes and
falls over, etc.
Eventually, we get a
breath of fresh air from this and return to Neo, Trinity, the machine world
and, obviously, the much commercialized fight of Smith and Neo in the rain. The
outsides of the machine world look great, likewise there’s a nice moment in
here when Trinity sees a natural beauty for the first time in her life and comments
on it before it disappears. Yet, it also leads a moment of the film that was
designed to be emotional is actually ends up being laughable in the extreme for
both what is said and how long it bores you.
Even though the Neo/Smith
fight again looks visually great, it’s also completely flat. These two can’t
hurt each other, but they keep going on and on in different ways to the point
where you are saying, “Finish the fight, guys.” Franklin mentions, “Indeed if
there's one thing this whole sequence does well is that it inspires you to
think about possibilities - not about what's happening on-screen but rather how
cool would a Superman movie be using the filmmaking techniques used here. The
ending I'm not going to even comment on, suffice it to say it renders the point
of pretty much everything before it moot and cheats the audience - its a stop
gap measure at best and leaves open way too many sequel possibilities for a
film that it was claimed would always be "the last".”
Is this movie worth
seeing? Maybe for the fans. Even though the action felt like something you
would see in a cartoon in the second film, it does have more weight here and by
having things take place in the real world, it does give it a bit more brutality
and a real sense of desperation at times, it’s interesting to see a movie where
the idea of people praying for a better tomorrow comes off sincere (for the
most part, at least).
Bruce Spence has a nice
little turn as a wild-eyed traveler program named the Train Man, and Hugo
Weaving does quite the best antagonist work ever as Smith. The main convincing
reason though is eye candy – this is what $200 million and a boatload of CG
machines can buy and filming techniques give in these scenes will probably
never be used again. For cinematographers and filmmakers of different skill who
have a liking for visuals, this movie is for you.
Sadly, it’s just flat for
the rest of the audience. Those who found “The Matrix Reloaded” not “sci-fi
action worthy” enough for them will get into this more. Yes, it’s designed as
more of a crowd pleasing film than the last. I agree with Franklin when he
says, “Yet I honestly prefer "Reloaded" myself and think with the failure
of many of this years bad sequels its been shown that people are getting tired
of these bloated blockbusters with little or no point.” Don’t believe any of
the talk from the producers that “this is actually the second half of one big
movie,” saying and look smartly this feels very different to the other two,
Franklin says, “far more glossier and vapid best sums it up.” A nice empty
ending to a film series which should’ve just ended at the first movie.
My brother was the only
one who went and saw this in the theaters. My sister and I didn’t see this
until I got it from the library, I say when I was in late high school, early
college. You can believe we fast forwarded through a good majority of this
movie since it was just boring us to death with so much dialogue and what
action there was, it felt flat. Undeniably, this is the worst one of the three. If you want to see this, go ahead, but I say
you should just watch the first one and “The Animatrix,” and that’s it. However, Nostalgia Critic is right when he says that none of these movies, even this one, is god-awful. All of them are still watchable and I credit them for at least making an impact in cinema.
So that ends “The Matrix
Month.” I hope I gave you good recommendations, although I think anyone could
tell you that it was obvious that they should have left the series off at the
first movie and not continue it on. Look out next month to see what else I have
in store for everyone.