What Dreams May Come

Vincent Ward’s “What Dreams May Come,” released in 1998, is so breathtaking, so beautiful, and so bold in its imagination, that it’s a surprise at the end to find it doesn’t finally deliver. It takes the audience to the emotional edge but it doesn’t push them over. It ends in a curiously unconvincing way – a conventional ending in a movie that for most of its length has been daring and visionary.

Roger Ebert said in his review, “So, yes, I have my disappointments with it. But I would not want them to discourage you from seeing it, because this is a film that even in its imperfect form shows how movies can imagine the unknown, can lead our imaginations into wonderful places.” It has heartbreakingly powerful performances by Robin Williams and Annabella Sciorra. The movie is so good because it shows us how it could have been better: It appears to go for a great leap, we can see it coming, and then it settles. If Hollywood is determined to short-change us with a necessary happy ending, then it shouldn’t torture us with a movie that deserves better.

Ebert admitted, “I hesitate to reveal too many secrets, but the film's set-up has been so thoroughly publicized that by now you probably already know certain key facts. Save the review until later if you don't.”

People knew from the ads and the trailers that Chris and Annie, played by Williams and Sciorra, have a Cute Meet when their boats crash on a Swiss lake. They marry, have two children (Jessica Brooks Grant and Josh Paddock), and are happy, but both of the children are killed in an accident. Annie has a breakdown, and Chris nurses her through, art works as therapy, they are somehow putting their lives back together, and then Chris is killed.

The film follows him into the afterlife and creates it with visuals that seem borrowed from his memories and imagination. Ebert said, “In one sequence that is among the most visually exciting I have ever seen, he occupies a landscape that is a painting, and as he plucks a flower it turns to oil paint in his hand. Other parts of this world seem cheerfully assembled from the storage rooms of images we keep in our minds: Renaissance art, the pre-Raphaelites, greeting cards, angel kitsch (cherubs float past on plump clouds). Later, when Chris ventures into Satan’s home, the images are darker and more fearsome--Bosch crossed with Dali.”

There is a guide in the next world named Albert, played by Cuba Gooding Jr. Is he all that he appears to be? Ebert said, “Now we have ventured beyond the information in the ads, and I will be more circumspect. The story, inspired by a novel by Richard Matheson, is founded on the assumption that heaven exists in a state of flux, that its inhabitants assume identities that please themselves, or us; that having been bound within one identity during life, we are set free.” Heaven, in one sense, means becoming who you want to be.

And Satan’s home? “It is for those who don’t know they’re dead,” says Albert. Or they know they’re dead but don’t know what the deal is. Or they won’t go along with the deal. Many of those in Satan’s home are guilty of the greatest sin against God, which is despair: They believe they are beyond hope.

After the death of her children and husband, Annie has gone into depression, commits suicide, and goes to Satan’s home. Chris wants to find her: “I’m her soul mate.” Albert says that’s not possible, “Nothing will make her recognize you.” However, he acts as a guide, and Chris goes into Satan’s home, which, like heaven, has been realized with a visual intensity and originality that is astonishing. In this film, the path to Satan’s home is paved, not with good intentions, but with the faces of the doomed, bitter, and complaining (the face and voice of Chris’s father are played by the German director Werner Herzog).

What happens then, what happens throughout the film, is like nothing you have seen before. Ebert noted, “Vincent Ward is a New Zealand director whose works have not always reached a large audience, but have always dared for big ideas and bold visuals to express them. He made "The Navigator" (1988), about medieval Englishmen who tunnel to escape the plague--and emerge in the present. And then, in 1993, he made the great "Map of the Human Heart," about the odyssey of an Eskimo boy from Alaska in the 1930s to London in the war, and from a great love affair to high adventure.”

Ebert continued, “"What Dreams May Come" ends, like "The Navigator," with the characters seeking their destiny in a cathedral--but this one, like many of the film's images, is like none you have seen before. It is upside-down, the great vaulted ceilings providing a floor and a landscape. Since I have mentioned Herzog, I might as well quote his belief that our century is "starving for great images."” This film provides them and also provides quiet moments of pleasant human nature, as when a character played by Rosalind Chao explains why she appears to be an Asian flight attendant, and when another, played by Max von Sydow, explains the rules of the game as he understands them.

Robin Williams somehow has a quality that makes him seem at home in imaginary realms. Remember him in “Popeye,” “The Adventures of Baron Munchausen,” “Toys,” “Jumanji,” and as the Genie in “Aladdin.” Ebert said, “There is a muscular reality about him, despite his mercurial wit, that anchors him and makes the fantastic images around him seem almost plausible.” He is good, too, at emotion: He brings us along with him. In Annabella Sciorra, he has a co-star whose own character is very unhappy and yet touching. Her sin of despair was committed, we believe because she loved so much and was so happy, she could not exist in the absence of those feelings.

Ebert said, “And yet, as I've suggested, the movie somehow gathers all these threads and its triumphant art direction and special effects, and then doesn't get across the finish line with them. I walked out of the theater sensing that I should have felt more, that an opportunity had been lost.” “What Dreams May Come” takes us too far and risks too much to turn conventional at the end. It could have been better. It could perhaps have been the best film that year. Whatever its shortcomings, it is a film to treasure.

This is one of those tear-jerker movies, but I wouldn’t be surprised if people cried while watching it. You should see this movie because it is very emotional and you will love it. I remember seeing a part of this movie with my sister years ago, but when I went back and saw the whole film, I had no idea it was “this” emotional. Check it out and have a good cry.

Next week I will be looking at another comedy in “Cuba Gooding Jr. Month.” Sorry for the late response. I took a nap, not realizing it, and woke up having to rush through stuff.