This isn’t a thriller in the modern sense, but more of
a ghost story of the type that succeeded a long time ago, when ordinary people
glimpsed hidden dimensions. Roger Ebert said in his review, “It has long been
believed that children are better than adults at seeing ghosts; the barriers of
skepticism and disbelief are not yet in place.” In this film, a small boy seriously
tells his psychologist, “I see dead people. They want me to do things for them.”
He appears to be right.
The psychologist is Malcolm Crowe, played by Bruce Willis,
who is shot one night in his home by a burglar, a man who had been his patient
years earlier and believes he was falsely diagnosed. The man then turns the gun
on himself. “The next fall,” as the caption informs, we see Crowe has recovered
but probably not in spirit, as he takes on a new patient, a boy named Cole
Sear, played by Haley Joel Osment, who shows some of the same problems as the
patient who shot at Crowe. Maybe this time he can get it right.
The film shows us things adults do not see. When Cole’s
mother, played by Toni Collette, leaves the kitchen for just a second and comes
back in the room, every door and drawer is open. At school, he tells his
teacher “They used to hang people here.” When the teacher thinks how Cole could
possibly know things like that, he reassures her, “When you were a boy, they
called you Stuttering Stanley.” It is Crowe’s job to speak to this boy and help
him if helping is what he actually needs. Maybe he is calling for help. He
knows how to say “From out of the depths I cry into you, oh Lord!” in Latin. Crowe
doesn’t really believe the boy’s stories, but Crowe himself is suffering,
partly because his wife, once so close, now appears to be having an affair and
doesn’t appear to hear him when he talks to her. The boy tells him, “Talk to
her when she’s asleep. That’s when she’ll hear you.” Using an “as if” approach
in therapy, Crowe asks Cole, “What do you think the dead people are trying to
tell you?” Ebert mentions, “This is an excellent question, seldom asked in
ghost stories, where the heroes are usually so egocentric they think the ghosts
have gone to all the trouble of appearing simply so they can see them. Cole has
some ideas. Crowe wonders whether the ideas aren't sound even if there aren't
really ghosts.”
Bruce Willis often sees himself in fantasies and
science fiction films. Ebert answers, “Perhaps he fits easily into them because
he is so down to earth. He rarely seems ridiculous, even when everything else
in the screen is absurd (see "Armageddon"), because he never
over-reaches; he usually plays his characters flat and matter of fact. Here
there is a poignancy in his bewilderment.” The film opens with the mayor giving
him a citation, and that moment marks the beginning of his
professional decline. He goes down with a type of doomed dignity.
Haley Joel Osment, his child co-star, is a very good
actor in a film where his character possibly has more lines than anyone else.
He’s in most of the scenes, and he has to act in them – this isn’t a role for a
cute kid who can stand there and look solemn in reaction shots. There are fairly
involved dialogue moments between Willis and Osment that require good timing,
reactions, and the ability to listen. Ebert noted, “Osment is more than equal to
them. And although the tendency is to notice how good he is, not every adult
actor can play heavy dramatic scenes with a kid and not seem to condescend (or,
even worse, to be subtly coaching and leading him). Willis can. Those scenes
give the movie its weight and make it as convincing as, under the
circumstances, it can possibly be.”
I’m with Ebert when he said, “I have to admit I was
blind-sided by the ending. The solution to many of the film's puzzlements is
right there in plain view, and the movie hasn't cheated, but the very boldness
of the storytelling carried me right past the crucial hints and right through
to the end of the film, where everything takes on an intriguing new dimension.”
The film was written and directed by M. Night Shyamalan, whose previous film, “Wide
Awake,” was also about a little boy with a supernatural ability. He mourned his
dead grandfather and demanded an explanation from God. Ebert admitted, “I
didn't think that one worked.” “The Sixth Sense” has a type of calm, sneaky
self-confidence that allows it to take us down a strange path, enchantingly.
I think everyone probably knows the twist ending in
this, but if you don’t, then you should see the movie because I cannot spoil it
for you. As the first Shyamalan film, this took everyone by surprise and everyone
loved it. When you see it, you will know and love it too. When my brother saw
it, I remember him walking up to us exclaiming how shocked he was with how the film ended. My sister had spoiled the ending for me, but not in grave
detail. What’s funny is that my brother asked me once if I saw him
covered in blood or with any wound marks, and I told him no. My sister let me
know that he was still in shock about the film. When I saw it as an adult, I
really enjoyed it.
Interesting fact: Bruce Willis learned to write with his
right hand in this movie, and he is left-handed. See this film if you haven’t
because you will really like it and will thoroughly find yourself invested in
the film the more you watch it.
Stay tuned next Monday when I talk about the next film
that people are split on, but I liked it when I saw it in “M. Night Shyamalan
Month.”
No comments:
Post a Comment