The actor from the last three Bourne films was not
casted in the fourth entry in this series. You will miss him in this one. Given
the mission to move forward with the franchise’s story without Damon,
writer-director Tony Gilroy misses something completely single-minded than the clichéd
reboot tool. He tells fans a similar story, going on at the same time as what
transpired in “The Bourne Ultimatum,” where the government says they want to
eliminate every one of the super agents they created for doing cool missions (a
new, more enhanced group is going to replace them).
Rene Rodriguez stated in her review, “But Cross, who
is one of the soldiers deemed obsolete, isn’t willing to go quietly. In his
previous movies, Gilroy (Duplicity, Michael Clayton) displayed a flair for
tangled, playful narratives that rewarded close attention and doled out
wonderful third-act bombs of surprise.” One of the letdowns in this movie that
there isn’t much to do in a movie underneath a messy, busy façade. Once they
start the narrative piece, the movie does the familiar Bourne formula of
government authorities trying to hunt their rouge agents. Once in a while, they
enlist an experienced person.
Renner can kill it in supporting roles (The Avengers,
Mission Impossible: Rouge Nation), but he can’t play a main role: He doesn’t
have what is needed to play in a huge movie like the Bourne sequels, and he
gets lost in the sauce. On a similar note, Weisz’s Dr. Shearing, who doesn’t
understand why her colleagues are now wanting to kill her, is a great character
and is not your typical damsel-in-distress than you could have imagined. In one
of the highlights of the movie, she does find out the company psychiatrist who
goes to her house to see her mental condition that might have another, more
evil plan. Rodriguez credits, “Weisz plays the scene so well, you actually
believe her character is in mortal peril, even though she hasn’t been in the
movie nearly long enough to get bumped off.”
Rodriguez said, “Besides, The Bourne Legacy isn’t the
sort of picture that takes risks, other than to see just how loud James Newton
Howard’s score can go without causing permanent deafness in the audience. There
is one fabulous set piece in the movie, a methodical mass-murder/suicide that
is shot and edited with harrowing, horrifying expertise.” As good of a writer
that he is, Gilroy is also a skilled filmmaker. The last half-hour of the movie
is one giant action scene in Manila – a chase done on foot, car and motorcycle –
that had to be extremely challenging to film and even more of a challenge to
edit. It looks great, but it’s also hard to watch, because when you reach that
part “The Bourne Legacy” proves to you that there are no surprises anywhere, no
more innovative stories to be made from this movie. The stunts, admittedly,
looks tiring. I guess you might wonder why Damon never appeared in this movie.
Overall, even though I wasn’t as engaged in this movie
as I was with the previous three installments, I do give this movie credit for
trying. Overall, this was a nice movie that I think it was definitely worth checking
out, so watch it and give it a chance. The movie is not entirely bad. I
understand that this movie might be an adaptation on a book that doesn’t have
Jason Bourne since I think his story was done in the books, but I can’t say for
sure since I never read the series. However, if this movie was going to start a
new series of stories in the Bourne series, than I give it credit for making a
nice starting point, although I think future sequels with Cross’s character was
scrapped since I think people wanted Jason Bourne again.
If you want to know how it ended up with fans wanting
Jason Bourne back in the movies, find out next week in the finale to “Jason
Bourne Month.”
Happy you liked this film. My dad and I really enjoyed it as well. The action at the end was great and I really liked the tension.
ReplyDeleteIt was a step down from the original trilogy, but it was still an intense film to check out
Delete