Scott Nash stated in his review, “Although the
timeline is again never made clear, general opinion, based on the novelization
and interviews with the writers, have made it clear that the story begins some
13 years after The Road Warrior, which was set roughly 5 years after the
original.” Max is still traveling through the desert on his own. After his
stuff gets stolen, he ends up in Bartertown, a city powered by pig droppings where a fight for control
is going on between Master Blaster (a technologically knowledge midget named
Master (Angelo Rossitto) piggy-backed by a strong, but voiceless giant named
Blaster (Paul Larsson)) and Aunt Entity (Tina Turner in a chain mail dress cut
as far up as a PG-13 rating will allow). Nash mentioned, “Max gets caught up in
their power struggle before finding himself in the desert where he meets up
with the cast of Lord of the Flies in the more silly last half of the story.”
Nash goes on to say, “In order, I assume, to appeal to
a broader audience and to suck in the teen audience, the filmmaker's opted to
make this installment rated PG-13 instead of the R rating of the first two
movies.” Because of this, the violence is brought down a lot and some cheap,
cartoonish humor is installed. This is really noticeable in the final, and
only, car chase. When Aunt Entity’s right-hand man, played by Angry Anderson,
drives in front of the train/truck hybrid that Max is driving, Max crashes into
the back of his man’s car, causing an explosion. However, instead of dying, he
just lands on the front of the train covered in ashes. Nash is right when he
says, “It's almost as if he's doing a Coyote impression from an old Road Runner
cartoon.” Later, when the same man dies, the camera zooms in on his clenched
fist. His arm tightens and flops before getting up long enough to give the
middle finger, before finally dying.
Nash questions, “I wonder how much of the weakening of
the film was caused by the death of producer Byron Kennedy, who died while
location scouting for the film. He co-created the franchise with George Miller
and reportedly Miller lost interest in making Thunderdome after the death of
his friend, which is why George Ogilvie was brought on as director, where
Miller had directed the first two. Miller gets a co-director credit because he
staged the action sequences.”
Although this is the worst in the series, it still
does have some funny scenes. It starts strong and up to the battle in the
Thunderdome arena it’s properly funny. However, once Max is tied to a horse and
is sent out into the desert, it starts to lose our interest. The kids are
really annoying and from the story of their experiences seem to have been
living out there for longer than the timeline allows them to. The city of
Bartertown also looks like it has been around longer than the thirteen years
would give them.
Gibson does another good job as Max, although the
character looks a little flat this time, but that must have a lot of blame on
the writing than his performance. Nash credits, “Turner wasn't actually as bad
as I remember, but her mere presence does add a certain camp value to the
proceedings.” An odd casting choice is bringing back Bruce Spence, who also was
in “The Road Warrior. The reason why it’s odd is because he’s casted as a
completely different character and no way did they try to make a disguise for
his appearance.
The backstory for this sequel includes stories of
nuclear holocaust, which contradicts the last two movies and interviews that
George Miller had done before the release. Before this movie, the end of the
world was always picturized as a general dying of society because of the shortage
of fuel. The introduction to “Mad Max 2” describes it happening exactly that
way and does not have any reference to a nuclear war. This doesn’t really hurt
the story, but is revealing of the general mess in the way the movie was put
together.
Since “The Road Warrior” felt like a nice addition of
the first movie and actually was superior in its quality, “Beyond Thunderdome”
is worse in every way. It looks like a huge studio trying to cash in on the
success of this franchise. Nash ended his review by saying, “If the promised
fourth film ever does get made (with Tom Hardy signed on to take over the part
of Max), I only hope it's a return to its R-rated roots rather than a reprise
of the quality of this one.”
Well, I got good news for you, Scott Nash. If you saw
the film, which I’m sure you did, it’s actually the best of the series. If you
want to know what I mean, stay tuned next Friday for the finale of “Mad Max
Month.”
No comments:
Post a Comment