Well, today marks the first day of "Black History Month," so as a
special celebration, I will review one film each week that is a must watch
during this month. And what better way to start off this month then with the
1989 biographical film, "Glory." The late Roger Ebert mentioned in
his review, “The story goes that the author of "Glory," Kevin Jarre,
was walking across Boston Common one day when he noticed something about a
Civil War memorial that he had never noticed before. Some of the soldiers in it
were black. Although the American Civil War is often referred to as the war to
free the slaves, it had never occurred to Jarre - or, apparently, to very many
others - that blacks themselves fought in the war. The inspiration for
"Glory" came to Jarre as he stood looking at the monument.” Now
here is the premise to the story:
The 54th Regiment of Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry, consisting of black
soldiers (some of them are Northern freeman, some of them are escaped slaves)
who are led by whites, one of them being Robert Gould Shaw. For those of
you that don't know who Shaw is, he is the son of Boston abolitionists.
Since this was a time of slavery, everyone had the belief that black soldiers
would not be good soldiers. True fact: Blacks were widely believed to not make
good soldiers and would not listen when disciplined under fire. However,
the 54th had been in one of the most violent battles in the war on July 18,
1863. That battle was an uphill attack against the Confederate in Charleston,
South Carolina, across a ground that was muddy. They had suffered a lot,
mainly due to how their fighting strategies that were ordering the soldiers to
keep marching into the gunfire, which is why this was suicidal. However, with
the soldiers doing what they were told and obeying the orders, it encouraged
the North to recruit more black soldiers, which were 180,000, and this might
have helped the war out a lot.
"Glory" tells this story of the 54th Regiment, which a huge
portion of the movie being seen through Shaw, played by Matthew Broderick, who
you will see earlier that he is scared from all the violence he is seeing out
on the battlefield.
Once he comes back home to heal from his injuries, he is told that he is
being recruited to lead a new black regiment. Even though his family shows
their doubts about leading black soldiers, by leaving the room, Shaw still takes
the job.
He knows that it’s his men's decision if they want to show Shaw that they
are capable of fighting in the Civil War. A good thing that came out of this
is his men are able to give him a look into the black race and human
nature. Note that this takes place a century before the whole civil
rights movement. The soldiers that eventually become the leaders of the 54th
are an escaped slave, Trip, who is played by one of the best actors ever
in this time period, Denzel Washington, and a gravedigger first seen meeting
Shaw injured on the battlefield, John Rawlins, played by Morgan Freeman.
These men are proud to be soldiers, proud to wear the uniform and proud to
accept the racism they witness in their surroundings, like when a decision has
to be made of whether white soldiers get paid more than black. They argue that
blacks march the same distance, bleed the same amount and die just as quickly
so why should they be paid less for doing the same amount of work? Shaw and his
right hand man, Cabot, who is played by another great actor, Cary Elwes, come
to see eye-to-eye with the black soldiers as to why they refuse their paychecks
and join to support their men into refusing theirs as well and backing them up
as to why they are refusing it. This can be called the climax to the film
because it joins the men and officers together into having mutual trust. Ebert
argues, “But there are countless smaller scenes that do the same thing,
including one in which Shaw is pointedly told by one of his men that when the
war is over, nothing much will have changed: "You'll go back to your big
house."” "Glory" was directed by Edward Zwick, designed by
Norman Garwood, and photographed by Freddie Francis. A good amount of attention
was given to detail, like when minor moments such as the shoes given to
the soldiers (Ebert notes, “they don't come in right and left, but get to be
that way after you've worn them long enough”) and the little ones lead up to
the big details. For instance, look at the scene when poor black sharecroppers
look wondering to see the black soldiers in uniform march past their homes. Also,
Raymond St. Jacques is in here briefly as Frederick Douglass. Every little
detail that leads to the larger details perfectly join together to lead up the
final battle, which is another suicidal march up a hill. This time, it
accomplishes very minor on military terms, but is important to the film.
Ebert noted, “Watching "Glory," I had one recurring problem. I
didn't understand why it had to be told so often from the point of view of the
54th's white commanding officer. Why did we see the black troops through his
eyes - instead of seeing him through theirs? To put it another way, why does
the top billing in this movie go to a white actor? I ask, not to be perverse,
but because I consider this primarily a story about a black experience and do
not know why it has to be seen largely through white eyes. Perhaps one answer
is that the significance of the 54th was the way in which it changed white
perceptions of black soldiers (changed them slowly enough, to be sure, that the
Vietnam War was the first in American history in which troops were not largely
segregated). "Glory" is a strong and valuable film no matter whose
eyes it is seen through. But there is still, I suspect, another and quite
different film to be made from this same material.”
Morgan Freeman has even said when he was on Inside the Actors Studio,
"'Glory' was a true story. Totally, totally true." Probably to
Morgan, it was the most important work that he has done because America learned
something. He claims that a lot of people wept because they didn't know that.
Obviously, Morgan enjoyed working with Denzel. He said, "I don't think you
can be better than the person you are working with. So if people say, 'you were
great,' well it was because you were with greatness."
Do stay tuned for more film reviews for Black History Month, although
tomorrow I will be reviewing a film that is very special to watch every year on
February 2nd. You might even know which film I'm saying.
No comments:
Post a Comment