Friday, July 7, 2017

Despicable Me

For the month of July, I think it would be appropriate enough to review an animated franchise that is great for families and I saw the latest installment on opening day. I am, of course, talking about the "Despicable Me" franchise. So, this month, it will be "Despicable Me Month." Let's get things started with the first "Despicable Me" movie, released in 2010. 

The film begins with the truth that villains are a lot of times more hilarious than heroes and makes a villain named Gru, who freeze-dries the people in front of him in line at Starbucks and pops children's balloons. Despite that he's inspired by many James Bond villains, two things make him different: (1) His great mad scientist lab is located not in the desert or on the moon, but in the baseman of his rural home, and (2) He doesn't dream of world domination as much as wanting to take over the news headlines as the Greatest Villain of All Time. 

Gru is voiced by Steve Carrell, who gives him an accent mixed with a Russian criminal and an insane Nazi. His life is really hard because his mother, voiced by Julie Andrews, sometimes hassles him. Roger Ebert noted in his review, "Memories stir of Rupert Pupkin in his basement, yanked from his fantasies by his mother's voice." Gru's most powerful weapon is the Insta-Freeze Gun, but now, with the help of his right-hand man Dr. Nefario, voiced by Katy Perry's former husband, Russell Brand, he can create Shrink Ray. 

Just has the entire world villain rule is in his hand, Gru is overshadowed by his worst enemy Vector, voiced by Marshall Eriksen from "How I Met Your Mother," Jason Segel, who steals the Great Pyramid. Ebert noted, "Since that pyramid was previously pounded to pieces by the Transformers, the Egyptians should establish a CGI-free zone around it." 

Gru is encouraged so much by his faithful minions, who are actually called the Minions, and, as Ebert describes, "look like yellow exercise balls with one or two eyes apiece." The main responsibility of the Minions is to inspire Gru, who calls them like he's an office manager. Ebert said, "He hatches a plan to use the Shrink Ray and steal no less than the moon itself, and explains it to the Minions with a plan that reminded me of nothing so much as the guy in the joke who plans to get the gorilla down out of the tree using only a broomstick, a pair of handcuffs and a savage Dalmatian dog." 

To make a villain into the protagonist of an animated comedy is quite a task, but the filmmakers add three cute kids to add good measure. They are Margo (Megan Parker from "Drake & Josh" and the title character from "iCarly," Miranda Cosgrove), Edith (Dana Gaier) and Agnes (Elsie Fisher). Gru meets them at his friendly neighborhood orphanage, the boss being the mysterious Miss Hattie, played by Kristen Wiig. His plan is to keep them at his home until his moon plan is ready to go, and then use the kids to break into Vector's house by deception – pretending to sell cookies. It goes like how the sun rises and sets that the orphans will work their childlike charms on Gru and eventually make him realize that the big man has a heart, similar to the Grinch. 

"Despicable Me" doesn't have a franchise to last very long, but it may have many sequels. Ebert said, "I'm not sure how Gru can think up anything more sensational than stealing the moon, but I'm sure Dr. Nefario is working on that as we speak. The film is funny, energetic, teeth-gnashingly venomous and animated with an eye to exploiting the 3-D process with such sure-fire techniques as a visit to an amusement park." 

Ebert ended his review by saying, "The sad thing, I am forced to report, is that the 3-D process produces a picture more dim than it should be. “Despicable Me” is technically competent and nowhere near the visual disaster that is “The Last Airbender,” but take my word for it: Try to find it in 2-D. Or, if you see it in 3-D, check out the trailers online to see how bright and cheery it would look in 2-D. How can people deceive themselves that 3-D is worth paying extra for?" 

Take my word for it, see this movie if you haven't. My siblings saw this in the theaters without me, but that was because I was taking a summer class at the time and I needed to get some work done. Little did I know is that they snuck into seeing "Toy Story 3." That's beside the point. When I saw this movie on DVD, I laughed a lot from beginning to end. If you have children, I think they will laugh a lot at this as well. Definitely don't miss your chance to see this movie. 

Stay tuned later tonight because I'm going to see the new Spider-Man movie. I'm really looking forward to seeing that movie because I think it should be the best Spider-Man movie ever. Review to come later tonight.

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

Independence Day: Resurgence

To say appropriately that “Independence Day: Resurgence,” released in 2016, ruined the look of its predecessor but the original “Independence Day” wasn’t really watchable to begin with. James Berardinelli rightly said in his review, “It’s probably better in our memories than it ever was on celluloid and, as a result, the sequel looks considerably worse by comparison. In fact, when it comes to dredging up old Devlin/Emmerich memories, Resurgence recalls nothing more strongly than the colossal 1998 misfire of Godzilla. Its shameless pilfering from science fiction classics (a little Star Wars, a little Aliens…) doesn’t appreciably elevate the material.” This is pure evidence of a story being slapped together to give the special effects the attention, not the other way around. When you start in satisfying foreign audiences first, you get a movie that is on the same scale as the Michael Bay “Transformers” franchise.

20 years is way too long to make a sequel and, currently, it’s safe to say that a large amount of the viewers don’t care. Berardinelli rightly said, “16-year old boys have turned into 36-year old men with other concerns. Independence Day may have caught lightning in a bottle; it’s doubtful the sequel will be as lucky. More likely, the studio will be left thunderstruck by how poorly it performs.” A better story would have helped out the movie but what is the major drawback is that Will Smith didn’t return. Berardinelli noted, “Then again, considering his (rejected) salary demands for reprising his role, maybe 20th Century Fox showed some semblance of fiscal sanity in this regard.”

Returning cast members include Jeff Goldblum as David Levinson, a scientist who now behaves the same way Ian Malcolm did in “Jurassic Park,” Bill Pullman as former President Whitmore, who still likes giving inspiring speeches, Judd Hirsch as David’s stubborn father, whose character is even more useless this time around, and a couple of other minor actors given more screen time, like Brent Spiner and Vivica A. Fox. Maika Monroe plays Patricia Whitmore, the president’s adult daughter, and Jessie T Usher is Dylan Hiller, the adopted son of Will Smith’s dead character. The alleged protagonist is Liam Hemsworth’s Jake Morrison, a fresh pilot who begins the movie being on the moon. Sela Ward is the current president and William Fichtner is the aggressive General Adams. (Robbert Loggia has a cameo. I can’t say for sure if this was filmed before Loggia passed away or if they had done some CGI like they did in “Rogue One.” Either one is possible seeing how can easily miss this appearance.)

“Independence Day: Resurgence” emerges on the 20th anniversary of the “War of 1996,” as they say it. Berardinelli noted, “Whitmore, a bearded, hobbled recluse (shades of Donald Pleasance in Halloween 6), is sounding the warning cry that the aliens are coming - something the moon crew, including Jake, finds out first-hand.” David, looking into the only alien ship left from the first attack, goes to the moon immediately spotting an interesting thing shot down. Berardinelli rightly said, “From that point, it’s an alien-invasion-by-the-numbers approach in the Emmerich/Devlin/Bruckheimer/Bay style, with lots of pyrotechnics, massive destruction, and far too many pointless secondary characters.”

“Independence Day: Resurgence” was going to be a light summer enjoyment, a chance to sit back and not think so hard. However, any sort of thinking will spoil the experience because this movie is so vacuous in having to sit through a small consideration. It’s too predictable and pointless to be more than occasional enjoyment and those moments don’t happen that often. Berardinelli’s rebuttal was, “With the exception of David (who, as I mentioned above, seems more like Goldblum’s Jurassic Park character than the original incarnation), everyone from the first film is treated rather shabbily.” The mission in “Independence Day: Resurgence” is get the new kids off of Earth and that isn’t successful. Berardinelli admitted, “During one of the endless, interminable dogfights, I started rooting for the aliens.” That’s not good.

The attack on the mother ship is supposed to be a tribute to the Death Star attack in “Star Wars.” Sadly, that doesn’t even succeed on the same area as Anakin shouting in excitement on the droid control ship in “The Phantom Menace.” Berardinelli said, “As for the queen alien - H.R. Giger’s estate should sue (I looked for his name in the end credits but didn’t see it). Although reminiscent of the alien’s look from the original Independence Day (which was, in and of itself, highly derivative of Alien), this one borrows so heavily from the queen mother in Aliens that I kept waiting for someone to shout the famous line from that movie. Didn’t happen. I guess Emmerich doesn’t recognize that, with a film this cheesy, that sort of thing will buy a little goodwill.”

Emmerich said that he was wanting to make a third “Independence Day” movie. Unless the film makes a lot of money abroad, I doubt it will happen. However, I think that we are not going to see a third movie, the filmmaker’s opposition to let his alien attack stay in the 90s allowed him to join in the image of all this display that is today’s blockbuster – American movies made for foreign audiences where the main language is violence, explosions and global annihilation.

In all honesty, if you liked the first movie as a guilty pleasure (I don’t really think I found it very fondly either), this movie is not for you. It’s a sad attempt at resurrecting a cheap 90s movie that it fails. I know that I have recommended patriotic movies in the past, but this one I don’t recommend at all. Stay away from this poor sequel at all cost. However, it’s not an entirely bad movie, but just one that is disappointing and not worth watching.

Happy Independence Day everyone. Check in to see what I will be reviewing this month.

Sunday, July 2, 2017

Men in Black trilogy

Today marks the 20th Anniversary of the one of the greatest sci-fi comedies ever made. Today, I will do a review on the trilogy, which happens to be one of my favorite sci-fi comedy trilogies ever made. Let’s jump right in to the first installment, “Men in Black,” released in 1997.

There is a moment in the movie when a serious government worker shows a video screen of “every alien on Earth.” We’re not really surprised to see some of the faces on screen: Sylvester Stallone, Al Roker, Newt Gingrich, and Dionne Warwick. (Ebert said in his review, “When the movie comes out on video, I'll use freeze frames to capture the rest.”) Funny little side jokes like that are the heart and soul of “Men in Black” (Ebert noted, “or "MiB," as it is already being called, no doubt in the movie title-as-software tradition of "ID4"”).

Ebert noted, “A lot of big-budget special-effects films are a hair this side of self-parody and don't know it.” “Men in Black” knows it and enjoys it. It’s an enjoyable Bronx look aimed at movies that think $100 million budgets are seriousness. Ebert mentioned, “This is not a film about superheroes, but the adventures of a couple of hard-working functionaries whose assignment is to keep tabs on the sizable alien population of the United States.”

Tommy Lee Jones, never more serious, not smiling and businesslike, stars as K, the veteran agent of Division 6, whose members dress, as Ebert puts it, “William Morris agents used to,” in black suits and black ties. The agency is under the command of Zed (Rip Torn), who gets really serious at the latest threat to Earth’s independence and tasks K a young rookie code-named J (Will Smith).

Their main threat comes along when a flying saucer hits the truck of a hillbilly named Edgar, played Vincent D’Onofrio, and the alien inside takes his body, not really comfortably. Ebert describes, “Imagine Orson Welles in a suit of armor and you will have a rough approximation of how easily the Edgar-alien inhabits his skin.”

The recurring joke in the movie is that almost anyone could be an alien. The film starts on the Mexican border, where Jones pulls over a group of officers (Fredric Lehne, Steve Rankin, Andy Prosky, Stephanie Paliferro and Robert Stahoviak) who have caught some illegal immigrants and picks out the one who is really an alien: a fantastical, blobby bug-eyed alien with a realistic human face mask (John Alexander).

The special effects are by Industrial Light and Magic, and the aliens are by Rick Baker, perhaps Hollywood’s greatest monster creator. Here he goes completely nuts. Instead of being told to make one alien race, he’s been told to create an entire galaxy race, and every one is a new surprise. Ebert made a funny remark saying, “There were times I thought we were seeing the new seven dwarfs: Slimy, Gooey, Icky, Creepy, Sticky, Barfy and Pox.”

The story (Ebert said, “If there can be said to be one, and if I understood it”) tells of a plan by "Edgar" to somehow use a captured galaxy to take over Earth.

Ebert said, “Although aliens would presumably be more advanced than we laggards on Earth, many of these aliens seem to have advanced only to the approximate level of the Three Stooges and are vanquished by a series of bizarre weapons employed by J and K (you may have seen the previews: "Any idea how to use this?" "None whatsoever.").”

Ebert goes on to say, “Linda Fiorentino, still looking for the right role to follow her triumph in "The Last Seduction," hasn't found it here - but her hard-bitten coroner will do nicely as an intermediate step.”

The movie makes good use of a lot of New York landmarks (there’s a chase through the Guggenheim, a flying saucer lands in She Stadium, and another one has been disguised as an exhibit at the 1964 World’s Fair.) Director Barry Sonnenfeld shows the happy devotion in the movie’s first hour or so to completely break away from all rules of boring storytelling and simply let the story have some laughs and insanities. Ebert noted, “Writer Ed Solomon, who on the basis of this irreverent screenplay could probably play all three of the critics on "MST3," deflates one sci-fi pomposity after another.”

When the story finally does settle in, it slows down the flight a little, but not seriously.

“Men in Black” goes on in that summer’s tradition, which had “Con Air” and “Batman and Robin” of big-budget action movies that at least had the humor to know how silly they were.

If you haven’t seen this movie, you should, it’s one of my favorite sci-fi comedies ever. Especially with the classic Will Smith line, “You know what’s the difference between you and me? I make this look good!” That is one of the funniest lines ever. As a child, I was obsessed with this movie and would watch it so many times. A few of my cousins still remember how crazy I was over this film.

We’re not done here, because we are going to look at the sequel, “Men in Black 2,” released in 2002.

Barry Sonnenfeld’s long-awaited sequel to his 1997 sci-fi comedy blockbuster “Men in Black” for some reason got bad reviews for being “more of the same.” I agree with John R. McEwen when he said, “I'm not sure what the critics are expecting—Men In Black II is more of the same, and that's why it's so entertaining. Reuniting Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones, one of the best onscreen duos since Matthau & Lemmon, MIBII does retrace some steps through New York City's alien crime community, but it introduces enough new material to be worth the ticket price, and features a rather amusing role reversal between the two agents, with Agent J (Smith) showing the former Agent K (Jones) around the halls of the top-secret MIB facility after K had his memory erased at the end of the first film.” Director Sonnenfeld, who spent the 1980s as a cinematographer and then suddenly changed to directing in 1991, has had his share of hits and misses, but soon slowly gains the silly tone for a worthy continuation of the established MIB story.

Written by Robert Gordon and Barry Fanaro, based on the comic book story by Lowell Cunningham, the story is about an evil, wormy alien called Serleena who comes to Earth (in disguise as the hot model Lara Flynn Boyle) and, with the help of a two-headed goofball named Scrad (Johnny Knoxville, playing both heads), tries to find the mysterious Light of Zartha, which will apparently give her power over the entire universe. As soon as she arrives, MIB chief Zed sees they’ll have to call back Agent K out of retirement because he’s the only one who knows where the Light is. K’s former partner J, who has been having trouble finding a new partner anyway, must drive to a rural town in Massachusetts (where K works as a postman) and convince him to come back to his previous job. Let’s not forget restore his entire memory.

McEwen said, “What made Men In Black work was the exquisite partnership of its two leads, along with a nice mix of cool effects and a multitude of memorable alien characters, created with every medium from rubber masks to puppetry to computer graphics. The fact that Sonnenfeld has chosen not to mess with a good thing doesn't necessarily mean he's out of ideas, but the formula can't sustain itself indefinitely.” Some of the new additions of this film are the replacement of the female character the hot Linda Fiorentino (who apparently won her MIB role from director Sonnenfeld in a poker game – maybe she lost this time) with the fresh-looking Rosario Dawson, and some surprising cameos from Chef Martha Stewart, the late Michael Jackson and Sonnenfeld himself. Also is Patrick Warburton in a short but hilarious role as J’s previous partner, T. Returning from the first film are Tony Shalhoub as the rough pawn shop owner who looks to have an unlimited amount of regenerating heads, and Frank the Dog (voiced by Tim Blaney), whose role has been really grown for the sequel.

McEwen said, “Smith and Jones perform together as smoothly as if they never left the studio, and the script sparkles with very much the same fluorescence.” Boyle is not a good villain compared to D’Onofrio. McEwen noted, “she basically plays the same character she plays on The Practice, except she's traded in the severe ponytail for a full mane of wavy black hair—and she has thousands of worms coming out of her. Oh, wait, she does have that on The Practice.” While the film’s ending doesn’t really hint there will be another sequel, it definitely doesn’t consider that, either. McEwen noted, “I imagine the answer to that will be determined by that most venerated of Hollywood formulas, the cha-ching factor.”

I know that people didn’t like this sequel, but I don’t think it’s as bad as everyone said it is. My siblings saw this in theaters with a couple of our cousins, and my siblings agreed that we weren’t annoyed by it and didn’t think it was bad. I personally think this was a good sequel, and definitely one of my favorite sequels. It might even be better than the first one, in my opinion. Definitely check this one out and give it a chance.

Much to everyone’s surprise, they came out with “Men in Black 3,” released in 2012. This comes 15 years after the entertaining original and 10 years after the wrongfully hated sequel, and the surprise is that it’s probably the best of them. Seeing how much time has passed, the entire idea may be new to some people watching this, but it still does work: There is a secret agency tasked to keeping track of every alien on Earth, and there are as many of them as makeup artist Rick Baker can think of. Ebert said, “I am not sure how undercover an MiB agent can be when he dresses exactly like the Blues Brothers, but never mind, they get the job done.”

The story until now: Veteran Agent K and his younger partner Agent J are under the command of Agent O, played by Emma Thompson, when there’s an emergency. The horrendously ugly alien Boris the Animal, played by Jemaine Clement, has escaped from a maximum security prison on the moon. He is the last surviving member of his people, still angry because Agent K shot off one of his arms. His plan: Travel back in time and kill Agent K before that can happen.

An arm like his, you don’t want shot off. Ebert noted, “Its palm apparently serves as a condo for a nasty little insectoid creature that will leap and take chunks out of you. Indeed, Boris is one of those aliens whose entire body seems to contain openings from which unappetizing things can forage on its victims.”

Time travel can become really difficult. To make it easy: Agent J tries to travel back in time to stop Boris the Animal from killing K. This happens as Young K alive in the same time period as J, who is the same age he started as, so the old man and the rookie are now equals.

How this works is the movie’s most impressive success. Young Agent K is played, not by Tommy Lee Jones in prosthetic makeup, but by Josh Brolin. The casting is done perfectly. He looks like a young Tommy Lee Jones, and Brolin imitates Jones so perfectly that director Barry Sonnenfeld, hearing him, supposedly cried from relief. Ebert admitted, “While watching the movie, I was convinced Jones dubbed his own voice.” Remember that Brolin also sounded just like former President George W. Bush in “W.”

Ebert said, “Anyway, Agent J travels back to save Agent K, and not content to populate the film with countless gob-smacking aliens from Rick Baker's fertile imagination, Sonnenfeld and his writer, Etan Cohen, also show a Hitchcockian flair for using ironic locations. For reasons I don't understand, in order to return to the "present," it's necessary to fall from a very great height and push a button on a gizmo at the last second. This involves Agent J crawling out on one of those medieval-looking eagles atop the Chrysler building, something you can imagine Hitch assigning Cary Grant to do.”

A skillful final scene takes place at Cape Kennedy on the day of the first moon landing attempt. Another gadget must be put on the moon to save the Earth, and this has a last-minute try to jump on the Apollo 11 pilot seat, insert the gadget and escape using one of the eject seats given for the astronauts in case of an emergency. Since the first moon launch was televised with many TV cameras and examined by endless binoculars, it looks unlikely this would have gone unnoticed. Ebert said, “Maybe there's a loophole — like if the attempt succeeds, it changes the future and turns out to be unnecessary.”

Who cares? The movie gets a comic relief from a sidekick character named Griffin, played by Michael Stuhlbarg, who wears a knitted Elmer Fudd hat and has the ability to see all the different variations resulting from any event during time travel. “Uh, oh,” he’s always saying, “this is the one where…”

Ebert ended his review by saying, “Let me say that although I liked the first “MiB” movie, I wasn't particularly looking forward to this belated sequel. But I had fun. It has an ingenious plot, bizarre monsters, audacious cliff-hanging, and you know what? A closing scene that adds a new and sort of touching dimension to the characters of J and K.”

In the end, I personally think that each installment got better and better. The first one was all about J, the second was about K, and this one has a “Back to the Future” feel to it which made J and K’s partnership grow closer as friends. This is another one of those great “Buddy Cop” movies that you should check out. Like the last two, this is another one of my favorites. If you saw the previous two, definitely see this one. My siblings saw the first one in theaters since I wasn’t old enough to go watch it, but we own it on VHS, so I took two of my younger cousins to see the third one. My siblings saw this as a rental from the library, and they liked it. This is one of those trilogies that I recommend everyone to watch, because like I already stated, this is one of my favorites.

Alright everyone, thanks for joining in on this long review, stay tuned in two days when I review my “Independence Day Movie.”

Friday, June 30, 2017

The Dead Pool

Now we get to the finale of "Dirty Harry Month" with the last installment, "The Dead Pool," released in 1988. 

Apparently, a small remote controlled car is irritating "Dirty" Harry Callahan. Steve Rhodes noted in his review, "A remote controlled toy, the jet black Corvette must have a souped-up engine since it can chase Harry's squad car with ease." However, it's not how fast that aggravates Inspector Callahan, it's the deadly weapon that is inside the children's toy car. Once it goes under a police car, it will incinerate Harry and his partner. 

Rhodes noted, "THE DEAD POOL, the last of the five Dirty Harry movies, is being re-released on DVD with a new digital transfer in celebration of the thirtieth anniversary of the start of the series." In this film, Harry is trying to stop a roulette game, called the dead pool, where people are betting on how different San Francisco celebrities, including Harry, will die. 

Out of all the movies in this franchise, this one has the best supporting cast, which has Patricia Clarkson as an annoying reporter, Liam Neeson as an avant-garde director and one of the betters in the game and Jim Carrey as one of the names to be crossed off the list rock star and drug addict. Carrey has tremendous energy and inhuman in one of his first films. Remember how I said that this film was released in 1988? It wouldn't be until 1994 when "Ace Ventura: Pet Detective" and "The Mask," both which starred Carrey, would skyrocket his name. Rhodes noted, "Carrey fans, of course, will remember one other well known film before THE DEAD POOL in which Carrey had a minor role -- 1986's PEGGY SUE GOT MARRIED." 

What's lacking of this differently enjoyable film from beginning to end is that there aren't any classic Dirty Harry quotes. Still there are a few that you can choose from – the best one being a line that's unwritten about a fortune cookie. Another is about his boss's lack of children. "Do you have any kids, lieutenant?," Harry asks. "No," Lt. Ackerman, played by Michael Goodwin, replies. "Lucky for them," Harry responds in his usual serious look. 

Also, Harry's partner in here is played by Evan C. Kim. 

In the end, go see this film for crying out loud. It's a "Dirty Harry" film, and I think all of you will enjoy it, if you enjoyed the previous ones in the series. I know I did, as I don't think any film in this franchise is worse than the other. All of them are good in their own way and all are worth checking out. 

Now we have come to the end of "Dirty Harry Month." I hope all of you enjoyed these reviews. Stay tuned next Tuesday for my yearly "Independence Day" reviews.

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Transformers: The Last Knight

Guess what everyone? I came back today from seeing the new Transformers movie, which came out last week, "Transformers: The Last Knight." Do you want to know how it is? Well, here it goes: 

Alan Jones started his review out by saying, "Phew, I think I need to lie down! It begins in the Dark Ages with hints of Monty Python and the Holy Grail and ends up at the Stonehenge monument in an "Oh, so that’s why it was built there?" flash of enlightenment." 

Jones goes on to say, "In between, Michael Bay, helming his fifth and supposedly final Transformers movie (who shouted "hooray"?), takes you into outer space, back in time to Nazi Germany, outside 10 Downing Street, into every far-flung corner of the globe for another super-sized slice of incomprehensible action and deep down into an ocean abyss to solve the convoluted mystery that lies at the heart of this quite overwhelming spectacle. Nothing seems to have changed in that mind-numbing aspect endemic to this franchise." 

Bay leaves no stone unturned as he finishes the franchise (unless he decides to return to direct another Transformers movie) basically crushing the viewer into dizzying submission. 

I guess it's debatable whether this or "Age of Extinction" is the worst in the series, but the first is still the best, but it definitely has the plot that has so much jammed into it that it's hard to keep track of. 

You will thank Anthony Hopkins who comes in at just the right time to explain everything – somewhat – so the audience can relax into another stretched out finale of mindless robotic action that is complete and total pandemonium. 

The basic jest (which the scriptwriters failed at) Optimus Prime, reprised by Peter Cullen, has gone back to Cybertron, the Transformers home planet. He gets manipulated into becoming Nemesis Prime by Quintessa (Gemma Chan) and ordered to go back to Earth and retrieve Merlin's staff that was buried by Merlin himself (Stanley Tucci). 

You heard right: Merlin was real, as was King Arthur – his round table was an extraterrestrial metal plate – and the Transformers have did their role in every huge and epic disaster in human history. 

Why? Because Earth is actually the evil space enemy Unicron in disguise, ready to kill humans and turn the planet into the Transformers' peaceful slumber when Cybertron eventually dies off. 

That is currently going on, and the Transformers' new ally, inventor Cade Yeager (Mark Whalberg), is chosen to be the Last Knight needed to help Oxford University Professor Vivian Webley (Laura Haddock), Merlin's descendant, find Merlin's staff before evil Transformer Megatron (Frank Welker) and his team of Decepticons do. 

Hopkins' character, Sir Edmund Burton, is the watcher of the Transformers family tree and the one who brings Cade and Vivian together and gives them the task on how to save Earth from becoming Unicron. 

This is exactly what returning Agent Simmons (John Turturro) is doing in Cuba or homeless teen Izabella (Isabela Moner) and her robot sidekick Sqweeks (Reno Wilson) have to do with all of this catastrophe is beyond what you can say. 

The right answer is that what is needed is unnecessary but with all of these different plot threads – you'll easily miss Mitch Pileggi from "X-Files" as a Transformers Reaction Force group leader – you can't focus on one little detail for a second as this "The Fast and the Furious" action goes by quickly. 

When he's on screen and evidently has a fun time – with lines like "What a rockin' car she is!" - Hopkins also brings, as Jones says, "a much-needed aristocratic gravitas to the scattershot logic." 

Jones goes on to say, "And while the pairing of Whalberg’s rough-and-ready hero with posh fish-out-of-water English Rose Haddock must have looked good on paper, they generate zero chemistry together, and the much hinted at post-credits romance feels a non-starter." 

Hands down the most amusing and funny character in the head-banging mess is Sir Edmund's robot butler, Cogman, voiced by Jim Carter. Jones describes him as a "C3PO’d "headmaster" (a Transformer fused with organic life, do keep up!) with anger-management issues is virtually the actor’s Carson character from Downtown Abbey in sleek Aston Martin disguise." 

Someone somewhere knows how to loosen things up, and Cogman playing background music at a church scene is the one joke that works in the repetition of comic reliefs that don't work – like Cade's friend Jimmy, played by Jerrod Carmichael. 

Seeing how no one goes to see a Transformers movie thinking there will be a story must have been the main problem this entire time. 

The technically overwhelming, grandiose set-piece ramble continues in Bay's overdrive style where he doesn't look like he's directing as much as assembling cinematic maneuvers. 

Jones said, "A pyrotechnic display from Bumblebee (Erik Aadahl) kicks off the action in high style and the frenetic hyperkinesis continues relentlessly through junkyard wipe-outs, frantic driverless car chases, drone-hopping acrobatics, titanic underwater odysseys, extravagant Autobot face-offs and abstract, Escher-type dimensional battles." 

Jones goes on to say, "Add bodies exploding everywhere in artful slow-motion and the painterly sight of horn-shaped intergalactic spacecraft jutting through the Namibian and Jordanian deserts and you still won’t have a clue about how completely over-the-top this movie is." 

"The Last Knight" is way too much, yet not anywhere close to enough to say it's fun entertainment in anyone's blockbuster wordlist. It may not be easy to watch, but the awesome visual looks will keep you in your seat. 

As I have stated before, it's better than "Age of Extinction," since it's nearly not as long, but it may be worst in the sense that there isn't much focus on Optimus or Megatron, the action goes on way too long, there are boring scenes in here, and the human characters just aren't that interesting. However, I thought it wasn't really that bad. I might have liked this over "Age of Extinction," but I still don't think it's a good movie in any way. None of the "Transformers" movies are good, but I still enjoy the action for some time before I start getting bored by it. Hopefully this is the last movie that Michael Bay directs, but if he comes back, I won't be surprised. I would say wait for this to come out on Blu-Ray to rent, but if you want to go to the theater, then that's fine. 

Thank you for joining in on my review, stay tuned Friday for the finale of "Dirty Harry Month."